On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:05:15 +0200, Robert wrote: >On Wed, 12 May 2010 19:35:14 +1000 >"Rod Whitworth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:23:45 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote: >> >> >On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:08:19PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote: >> >> >> >> Then come back and tell me why ALL the examples start with >> >> "match" ? (i.e. NAT in man pf.conf for 4.7) >> >> >> > >> >maybe the idea was that it's simpler to write pass/block rules for >> >your traffic, then just match the nat stuff. i don;t know. >> >> And neither does anyone else who hangs out here, it seems. > >? >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20090901 >http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125181847818600&w=2 >
Have you actually written and tested a ruleset using either of those documents? If so please show us. Particularly seeing I referenced both of those in my original post as not being helpful and I've been trying to get somebody - anybody - to write a minimal NAT ruleset and show me. *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list. Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. Rod/ --- This life is not the real thing. It is not even in Beta. If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
