On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:35:27 +0000 (UTC)
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2010-08-03, Kevin Chadwick <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> All right , let me put it straight , a have a 3G card , a cable with
> >> 1M bandwidth , i'd like to take use of them together , that's
> >> so-called double routes (maybe load balance) , don't know if it is
> >> possible.  
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the trunk interface (roundrobin or loadbalance mode)
> > will do what your looking for, if you have an interface for each
> > connection? The differing connection speeds, may be a concern however?
> >
> 
> nope, trunk is layer 2, this situation needs something at layer 3.
> ECMP (-mpath) routing table entries may work, or use route-to/reply-to
> in PF (which is nice if you want to classify traffic more closely e.g.
> send latency-sensitive traffic over cable rather than 3G). you can
> probably also do something with rtables in the mix, but i haven't
> worked out how yet.
> 
> N.B. if your providers follow best practices, typical subscriber
> connections will reject packets with the "wrong" source address (i.e. the
> source address from the other connection). this is especially likely with
> a 3G connection which, in most cases, will be stuck behind NAT, so even
> if your provider is too slack to intentionally implement BCP38, it
> still won't work. so:
> 
> **  if you have problems then use tcpdump and look carefully
>     at which source addresses are used on each interface
> 
> (semi-related, uk-based readers might be interested to keep an eye
> on aaisp, who do 3g sims and plan on offering routed static IP <and also
> l2tp handoff at some time>, i suspect in conjunction with aql/three).
> 

right you are (ppp), Sound like this will help you deal with the
speed/latency/expense probs too.

Correct me if I'm wrong again but another option for redundancy would be
to use two boxes for the connections with a trunk in failover mode.
(I'm guessing you don't want to increase bandwidth, if you've chosen
3g?, or is this just a laptop or something?)

Reply via email to