On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:17PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Is there any useful documentation that explains how you're supposed to
> write C code and what's changed under the i18n New World Order?  From
> your message, it sounds like we're going to have to rewrite nearly all
> of our user-space code...

Not only does switching to unicode require a lot of work, but it
requires perpetual, unending work.  Unicode has the foolish goal of
including all known characters, so every time a country invents a new
currency symbol, for example, the unicode fonts (such as DejaVu) must be
updated to include the symbol and the C library has to be updated to
recognize that the symbol is printable, and so on.  It requires constant
maintenance.

But it's even worse, because unicode also violates the principle
(established by Alan Turing in 1936) that any two characters should be
humanly distinguishable "at a glance".  This has led to the invention of
punycode for translating unicode strings into humanly distinguishable
ASCII strings.  But then why did we switch from ASCII to unicode in the
first place?

It's my opinion that unicode shouldn't have a place in the Unix
terminal.  You might want your GUI to display unicode characters, but
when I'm working from a terminal, I want to see the data as closely as
possible to the way that the computer "sees" the data.  For example, I
don't want nvi to display unicode characters, I want to see each
individual 8-bit byte that composes the character.  I don't want unicode
on the command line.

Reply via email to