On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>wrote:
> On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal <t...@polarcap.org> wrote: > > rtlabel label > > Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel > routing > > table. > > I think this should be: > > Add the prefix to the kernel routing table with the specified label. > > Index: bgpd.conf.5 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/bgpd.conf.5,v > retrieving revision 1.112 > diff -u -p -r1.112 bgpd.conf.5 > --- bgpd.conf.5 13 Oct 2010 21:04:13 -0000 1.112 > +++ bgpd.conf.5 23 Oct 2010 16:12:36 -0000 > @@ -1432,9 +1432,9 @@ times to the > .Em AS path . > .Pp > .It Ic rtlabel Ar label > -Add the prefix with the specified > -.Ar label > -to the kernel routing table. > +Add the prefix to the kernel routing table > +with the specified > +.Ar label . > .Pp > .It Ic weight Ar number > The > > > ...maybe we could also add something like, "Can be used to > redistribute routes to another routing protocol daemon", > or maybe we should leave that for people to figure out themselves. > > How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ? I connect devices to the core network using two core routers and redistributing BGP->OSPF would be happening on both of them. Regards Tony
