> >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> .. would have expected
> >>> "bioctl -R sd1 softraid0" for the case below.
> >>
> >> What slice is being rebuilt onto?
> >
> > Well... i guess i was thinking that from the unit identifier
> > in softraid<n> the actual raid volume would be known.
> >
> > Can different volumes share a single softraid device?
>
> I don't understand the question.
>
It turns out that I don't understand how this is supposed to work.
I have (err, had) this working array:
# bioctl softraid0
Volume Status Size Device
softraid0 0 Online 3997412864 sd2 RAID1
0 Online 3997412864 0:0.0 noencl <sd1a>
1 Online 3997412864 0:1.0 noencl <sd0a>
Now, with one drive unplugged, i get:
# bioctl softraid0
Volume Status Size Device
softraid0 0 Degraded 3997412864 sd2 RAID1
0 Online 3997412864 0:0.0 noencl <sd1a>
1 Offline 3997412864 0:1.0 noencl <sd0a>
With sd0 replaced again, i expected
"bioctl -R sd0 softraid0" to give an error
"bioctl -R sd0 sd2" to start a rebuild.
But neither form works. Both report:
bioctl: Target sd0: target not specified
Which command is supposed to correctly rebuild the array?
Regards, and thanks anyway
Niels
