On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:55:59PM -0800, James Hozier wrote:
> > From: Fred Crowson <fred.crow...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: How to test if
> sound is working?
> > To: "James Hozier" <guitars...@yahoo.com>
> > Cc:
> misc@openbsd.org
> > Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 10:55 PM
> > On 8 November
> 2010 22:04, James
> > Hozier <guitars...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > $ cat
> azalia_codec.c.rej
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@
> > > this->name = NULL;
> > >
> this->qrks = AZ_QRK_NONE;
> > > switch (this->vid) {
> > > + case
> 0x10134206:
> > > + this->name = "Cirrus
> > Logic CS4206";
> > > + if
> (this->subid ==
> > 0x106b4d00) { /* APPLE_MBP55 */
> > > +
> >
> this->qrks |= AZ_QRK_GPIO_UNMUTE_1 |
> > > +
> >
> AZ_QRK_GPIO_UNMUTE_3;
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > case
> 0x10ec0260:
> > > this->name = "Realtek
> > ALC260";
> > > break;
> > >
> > > What does this mean? It looks like a snippet of code
> > from the original
> patch
> > file?
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > For some reason patch(1) did not insert the
> code into
> > azalia_codec.c
> > - I would guess that the reason was that patch
> file had
> > some
> > formatting that patch(1) did not like. Have another go at
> >
> creating and
> > patching the file, or you can either manually add those 7
> > new
> lines to
> > azailia_codec.c after line 77 of azaila_codec.c
> >
> > Thus when you
> rebuilt your kernel - it did not have this
> > new bit of code in.
> >
> > hth
> >
> >
> Fred
> >
> >
>
> Hmm...added those lines to azalia_codec.c after line 66 (without
> the + signs in front
> of the lines), re-compiled and rebooted but still
> nothing. I guess it's something
> else, then...but I'm curious as to why the
> patch didn't work.
judging by the formatting of your emails, the patch got mangled by
your mailer.
inlining patches in email messages (as opposed to MIME attachments)
is part of OpenBSD culture.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
