W dniu 2010-11-18 13:42, Schvberle Daniel pisze:

So the conclusion might be:
- there is problem with my Intel NIC model/cheapset
- there is problem with em driver
- there is problem with my hardware (I need serwer motherboard with pcie
and pci 64bit 66mhz)
- I need faster CPU than P4 3GHz ??

   or

- there is a problem with iperf  :)

How about measuring with something else? Did you try tcpbench? Or something
even simpler, like scp-ing from /dev/null to /dev/null? With pf and queues
enabled you can monitor the B/S rate.



there is no tcpbench in packages for 4.8 and for debian linux

1.
transferring file by scp from router-test to linux machine:
transfer speed: 16.1MB/s ~ 128.8 Mbits/s

r...@router-test (/root)# top

load averages:  1.59,  1.05,  0.67
28 processes:  2 running, 25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states: 33.3% user, 0.0% nice, 47.9% system, 14.2% interrupt, 4.6% idle
Memory: Real: 11M/80M act/tot  Free: 405M  Swap: 0K/759M used/tot


r...@router-test (/root)# systat queue

2 users    Load 1.49 0.99 0.74                      Thu Nov 18 16:27:25 2010

QUEUE BW SCH PR PKTS BYTES DROP_P DROP_B QLEN BORR SUSP P/S B/S root_em0 1000M cbq 0 10M 14G 0 0 0 0 0 122 17M q_lan 950M cbq 10M 14G 0 0 0 0 0 122 17M


2.
transferring file back from linux machine to router-test:
transfer speed:  19.9MB/s ~ 159.2 Mbits/s

r...@router-test (/root)# top

load averages:  1.13,  0.95,  0.69
25 processes:  1 running, 23 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states: 40.1% user, 0.0% nice, 33.5% system, 26.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Memory: Real: 11M/80M act/tot  Free: 405M  Swap: 0K/759M used/tot


3.
as comparison transfer speed between two debian boxes:
- tested by iperf: 940 Mbits/sec
- transfering file by scp: 42.6MB/s ~ 340.8 Mbits/s

top:

Tasks:  81 total,   1 running,  80 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.8%us, 13.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 79.0%id, 0.0%wa, 1.0%hi, 4.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem:   1028836k total,   924868k used,   103968k free,    23800k buffers
Swap:  1951856k total,    51524k used,  1900332k free,   617788k cached


----
best regards
RLW

Reply via email to