OK. But OpenBSD also has "OPENBSD_5_4_BASE" which is what I understood as "primary snapshot release for 5.4" and "OPENBSD_5_4" which I understand as "5.4 release plus required (security only ?) patches". I thought, maybe opensmtpd would also be updated in "OPENBSD_5_4" and not only in "HEAD".
From what I see, OpenSMTPD as shipped with OpenBSD 5.4 is tagged 5.4. Last snapshot I grabbed (mostly for Bug #333 correction) is tagged 201310281422. It's not straight forward to deal with but since one knows when OpenBSD 5.4 start shipping... :) So since OpenBSD X.X is released, the only way to get new featured or bug corrected OpenSMTPD is either use OpenBSD "HEAD" or OpenSMTPD snapshots, right? Le 8 nov. 2013 à 18:16, Bryan Vyhmeister <[email protected]> a écrit : > The version in archives is definitely newer. A release of OpenBSD is tagged > and the tree frozen for that release months back in order for CD duplication > and so forth. That's why archives has a much newer version. It is regularly > synced to -current as you noticed and I believe 5.4 has OpenSMTPD version > 5.3.x. > > Bryan > > --- > Bryan Vyhmeister > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 8, 2013, at 9:11, Joel Carnat <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was looking at opensmtpd in brand new openbsd 5.4 and it seems not to be >> as fresh as the one in /archives/. >> I also had a look at the Web CVS of OpenBSD and, as far as I understood it, >> opensmtpd seem to not be synced in the "release" tree but rather in the >> "current" one. >> >> Am I wrong or do one have to rather use /archives/ to be able to get the >> required latest fixes on opensmtpd ? >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] >> > > -- > You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] > -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
