On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:19:26PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > On 2013-12-13 15:51, [email protected] wrote: > > User gilles has just rebuilt a portable snapshot, available from: > > > > http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201312131550p1.tar.gz > > > > Checksum: > > > > SHA256 (opensmtpd-201312131550p1.tar.gz) = > > c0f2060cb1ada2f9fe44c95a4ae67a9feac784f72bcf1ecb8849517c5c49a7d2 > > > > A summary of the content of this snapshot is available below. > > > > Please test and let us know if it breaks something! > > > > If this snapshot doesn't work, please also test with a previous one, > > to help us spot where the issue is comming from. You can access all > > previous snapshots here: > > > > http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/ > > > > The OpenSMTPD team ;-) > > > > > > Summary of changes since last snapshot (opensmtpd-201312081717p1): > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > - perform hostname lookup BEFORE starting tls > > - implement SNI support > > Does this mean smtpd supports peers that use SNI, or can I listen with > several different hostnames/certificate pairs on a same server? >
We currently only support it on the listen side > > - tons of bzero -> memset replacements > > - a couple bcopy -> memmove > > - remove some struct members that are no long relevant after cleanup > > - do not disable routes on smtp errors anymore > > - KILL the failed-queue mechanism > > - KILL the envelopes penalty mechanism > > > > -- > > You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] > > > > -- > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
