>[snip] >Well you don't see the issue for your use-case, the issue is that >for pretty much every other use-case this is not what's desired.
My argument would be that if you don't want that behaviour then you shouldn't use the modifier, however ... >We discussed shortly a new kind of rules with eric@ yesterday, it >is not too hard to implement so maybe we'll go that path. It is >inspired by PF: > > match for any virtual <vmap> tag MATCHED > accept tagged MATCHED for any virtual <vmap> relay > accept for any relay > >this way you would only match the relay rule if the match rule has >properly set the tag. ... that works for me too. >we're not going to implement this for the time being, it still has >to be discussed and the semantics clearly defined, but that's >something that is likely to happen in the future. Well as long as it is on the list then that is good. Regards JC -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
