Thanks for the report, I'm glad you finally got it working. Just a notification for mailing list, the recent stable opensmtpd version for recent Fedora is available in standard repos, and for RHEL and its derivatives you can use EPEL. If any problems with the packages, please let me know.
-- wbr, Denis. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Noneof Yourbusiness < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > ah ok, i didn't know 5.4.2p1-1.el6 got released, at least it wasn't 2 days > ago. Anyhow, i tested it and it seems to work now, yay. This really gave me > some sleepless nights, now i can finally relax. > Thanks for your help and thanks for porting it to CentOS. > > > > 2014-03-27 8:11 GMT+01:00 Denis Fateyev <[email protected]>: > > Hello, >> >> First, you should try with the latest version 5.4.2p1-1.el6 (which is >> available in EPEL) to check if the problem still exist. >> The previous version had some problems with PAM indeed, maybe they are >> already fixed. >> Unfortunately, I don't use secrets tables in my config so I can't check >> it on my side. >> >> -- >> wbr, Denis. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Noneof Yourbusiness < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I am not really sure where the problem is, since the secrets table is >>> loaded and so is the domain file. I can only assume that it's a linux-port >>> related issue in relation with pam or a layer 8 problem which seems very >>> unlikely at this point. >>> >>> On another note, while testing and trying to understand this behavior, >>> the sendmail from this package seems to be using the fqdn >>> (hostname.domain.tld) in order to send mails via mail command. This results >>> in "Sender address rejected: Domain not found" because the MX can not be >>> resolved because the fqdn is not the MX record. >>> >>> I already talked to __gilles on irc, where he suggested that i should >>> try contacting the maintainer dfateyev, which is why i am here. >>> >>
