Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 11:31:52 Gilles Chehade a écrit : > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > > ohai, > > > > > > if you're interested in getting LDAP fixed, I plan a debugging > > > session this Thusrday at 7PM (Europe/Paris) on IRC: #opensmtpd @ > > > freenode > > > > > > im willing to stay working on it as long as it takes for all > > > crashes to go, but given that im not an LDAP user and not too > > > familiar with it, I would love to have some LDAP users around > > > ;-) > > > > I will try to be there, unfortunately starting at 21h for me, > > cause I have a language exam at 19h ! > > it's ok, i will still be around > > > I can give you some ideas about what are to be solved according to > > me before that day. > > i'm not so much interested in new features and use-cases at this > point, i just want to make sure that people who have ran into > crashes no longer experience them. new features will come later
The first I was thinking of was anonymous auth. It's quite common. I understand your concern not to add new stuff all the time (at this time of the project). Not specifying a cn=admin password makes the ldap table not working. As weird as it is. I don't know if you should consider it bug to solve or feature to implement.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
