On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 07:20:01AM +0530, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:35:55 +0200, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> said: > | OpenSMTPD 5.4.5 has just been released. > > | OpenSMTPD is a FREE implementation of the SMTP protocol with some common > | extensions. It allows ordinary machines to exchange e-mails with systems > | speaking the SMTP protocol. It implements a fairly large part of RFC5321 > | and can already cover a large range of use-cases. > > | It runs on OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, DragonFlyBSD, OSX and Linux. > > | The archives are now available from the main site at www.OpenSMTPD.org > > | We would like to thank the OpenSMTPD community for their help in testing > | the snapshots, reporting bugs, contributing code and packaging for other > | systems. > > | This is a minor release with bugfixes only. > > | New features since last stable release (5.4.4): > | =============================================== > > | * remove a hack introduced a very long time ago and which leads > | to a crash when OpenSMTPD is built with gcc's FORTIFY option. > > | * fix a getlogin()-related issue leading to invalid sender when > | an application enqueues mail on behalf of a user. > > | * fix a logic error in the SNI code leading to [1]: > | - possible unexpected disconnect of some clients; > | - possible invalid SNI certificate being presented to some clients; > | - possible crash of the daemon. > > > Hi, > > Thanks for the new release. I've couple of issues with this portable release > tarball: > > - Not bootstrapped, aka no configure script present >
damn, I had patched the tarball script to bootstrap, I'll regen a 5.4.5p2 very shortly :-( > - Outdated/misleading options which don't do anything (since 5.4.4), yet are > still present: > > --with-experimental-* > true, 5.4.5p2 will not have them > Also I noticed there are no _git_ tags present for the releases in > OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD git mirror, although I did notice some github specific > thing[1], via IRC notifications. > yes, that is strange, I did push the tags and git confirms that the repo at github is up-to-date. I don't see the tags for older releases either, by the way and they're also pushed as I've used them to rebuild tarballs in the past. I'll investigate. -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
