On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On May 30, 2015 8:59 AM, "Joerg Jung" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Am 29.05.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>: > > > > > > I took some of your ideas into consideration with this pull request: > > > https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD-extras/pull/20 > > > This succeeds this earlier patch. > > > > I still think that luajit should not be the first in the row > > (as long as not specified explicitly with config option). > > From sysadmin point of view, if Lua is requested as > > dependency, one expects to get Lua as default, not > > LuaJit, no matter which has the better performance. > > That's what --with-lua-type=lua is for -- avoiding autodetection for the > sysadmin to choose the best one. > > For autodetection, if luajit is installed on a system, it's probably been > done so deliberately, and so should be used if available. > > > > > Regards, > > Joerg > >
What's the final decision on this ? -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
