On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Gilles Chehade wrote: > What I'm wondering is if there's any reason that would prevent RHEL, for > example, to package LibreSSL in the same way that libasr was packaged so > that OpenSMTPD could specifically depend on it. > > The system would keep its default SSL library. >
Library name collision ---------------------- Libasr is a unique library name on Linux as far as I know and there is no problem installing it. LibreSSL contains library names libcrypto and libssl which collide with the identical names in OpenSSL on most Linux systems. Can the libcrypto and libssl library names in LibreSSL be changed? Maybe they can change to liblibrecrypto and liblibressl? LibreSSL also uses library libtls. Is libtls unique in Linux? If not maybe it can change to liblibretls? Changing the library names allows LibreSSL and OpenSSL to exist side by side on any Linux system. Richard Narron -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
