makes sense indeed. In that case would be OK if I include that user in the wheel group? I mean from a security point of view.Any concerns about this?
Thank you for your help On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Teno Deuter wrote: >> indeed. What I'm doing is the following: >> >> a system user who is part of the wheel group, launches a neomutt >> session and sends an email. I thought that this user tries to do the >> dkim sign but obviously this is wrong! Could it be the '_dkimproxy' >> user or the '_smtpd' one? >> > > probably _dkimproxy, smtpd doesn't do signing > > >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:22:52AM +0200, Teno Deuter wrote: >> >> I had that before but then I get the following error in the maillog: >> >> >> >> dkimproxy.out[71987]: signing error: Error: cannot read >> >> /var/dkimproxy/default.private: Permission denied >> >> >> > >> > Permission denied may be caused by access to the directory too, i suspect >> > that >> > whatever is trying to dkim sign does not have the rights to reach your key. >> > >> > -- >> > Gilles Chehade >> > >> > https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg >> >> -- >> You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] >> > > -- > Gilles Chehade > > https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
