On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 07:02:14PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> I think this was probably an oversight.
> 

no, this wasn't an oversight.

the new grammar used TAG, not TAGGED which will be removed


> Index: parse.y
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/parse.y,v
> retrieving revision 1.232
> diff -u -p -u -r1.232 parse.y
> --- parse.y   30 Nov 2018 15:33:40 -0000      1.232
> +++ parse.y   3 Dec 2018 01:00:45 -0000
> @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ ACTION STRING {
>  ;
>  
>  match_option:
> -negation TAG tables {
> +negation TAGGED tables {
>       struct table   *t = $3;
>  
>       if (rule->flag_tag) {
> 
> -- 
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> 

-- 
Gilles Chehade                                                 @poolpOrg

https://www.poolp.org                 tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg

-- 
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org

Reply via email to