Hello Jiri!
[email protected] (Jiri Navratil), 2022.03.08 (Tue) 18:19 (CET):
> Thank you for this advice.
> I never used this way. When adding just
> set sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail
> there was no improvement. When I also used
> unset smtp_url
Ah, yes, these are certainly mutually exclusive.
Using the sendmail binary for local enqueueing and smtp at the
same time doesn't make much sense.
> Then I got
> Error sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.).
> Could not send the message.
You are on OpenBSD, if I remember this thread correctly.
What does
print testmail | mail -s testmail [email protected]
do? This should call the same binary as the
set sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail
configuration option.
This way we'll see if local enqueueing[*] is broken on your machine.
See mailwrapper(8) and mailer.conf(5) for all the gory details.
Marcus
[*] I love the spelling of this word.
> Not sure if I have to adjust permissions of the wrapper or do anything
> else, so for now I will try to fix the smtp_url approach first.
>
> Best regards,
> Jiří
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:52:45AM +0100, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > [email protected] (Jiri Navratil), 2022.03.06 (Sun) 14:28 (CET):
> > > I'm using notebook with OpenBSD and every email from mail and from mutt
> > > goes firstly to OpenSMTPD on localhost and then are relayed to my
> > > server with static IP.
> > > I have been using in OpenBSD 6.7 for mutt
> > > set smtp_url="smtp://127.0.0.1"
> >
> > This is not a solution and not an answer to your question,
> > but why don't you just use
> >
> > set sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail
> >
> > in your muttrc(5)?
> >
> > Marcus
