Hello, On 06/12/24 12:44, Philipp wrote: > [2024-11-27 11:12] Philipp <phil...@bureaucracy.de> >> I would like to understand whats the reason for this quite low limit. >> Also I'm currently unsure what a reasonable default limit would be. >> An option to change this limit would also be nice. I check if I can >> write a patch for this on the weekend. > I have attached a patch for this. I haven't had the time to test it. >
I'm not opposed to something like this. My only concern is that you're providing a knob that applies to all the user in a system, while I'd prefer to err on the safe side and have a cap per user. This way, you only need to bump the limit per the user(s) you're using to deliver the mail. Maybe we could also provide a global knob though. (another option would be to use smtp(1) and connect to localhost, this will avoid the limits, but if you're not mentioned it I assume you've discarded this option for some reason) One nitpick is about the "control" keyword. maybe we could augment the `listen on socket` with a `connection limit user $N` argument instead.
