> CVS may be crusty, but personally I'm still not remotely comfortable > using Git after some three-odd attempts to learn to use it. However, > if I'm the only one to whom it is nearly as unusably opaque as Arch, > then it is probably not worth stalling for my sake alone.
I'm not a fan of git, either, but would prefer it over CVS, which doesn't preserve important information, e.g. change sets. Savannah appears to support either CVS or git, but nothing else, so the choices are limited if the project is to remain there. I vote for git despite its unpleasantness. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
