> From: Taylor R Campbell <campb...@mumble.net>
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:15:05 +0000
>
> I haven't looked closely at SVM in a while. Is the compiled code
> dependent on the word size of the physical machine that executes it?
Now that you mention it, I think the only dependencies are in
ea:uuo-entry-address and generate/cons-{multi,}closure, and they could
be eliminated with an "indexed" mode address. I'll see to it unless
you want to.
Is the rest of LIAR already word size independent? I see just a few
suspicious references to address-units-per-object in opncod.scm and
rtlty2.scm...
_______________________________________________
MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list
MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
