Hi,
Am 5. März 2012 23:54 schrieb Chris Hanson <c...@chris-hanson.org>:
> I made this change because a user reported that the code failed to
> compile in slackware when both were included.
>
> Is there a use case where both must be included? Or should I just
> change it to prefer termcap.h over term.h?
[...]
I've just tried to built Scheme with include order of `term.h' and
`termcap.h' in `tterm.c' reversed . This inclusion order seems to work
- at least for the Linuxes (Debian testing and Arch Linux) at my
disposal.
Dirk
diff -r 0372071d69cd src/microcode/tterm.c
--- a/src/microcode/tterm.c Tue Mar 06 00:37:51 2012 +0100
+++ b/src/microcode/tterm.c Tue Mar 06 00:38:46 2012 +0100
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@
macro expanding to a function call. WTF? Unix sucks. */
#undef ospeed
-#if defined(HAVE_TERM_H)
+#if defined(HAVE_TERMCAP_H)
+# include <termcap.h>
+#elif defined(HAVE_TERM_H)
# include <term.h>
-#elif defined(HAVE_TERMCAP_H)
-# include <termcap.h>
#else
extern int tgetent (char *, const char *);
extern int tgetnum (const char *);
_______________________________________________
MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list
MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
