> From: Matt Birkholz <m...@birkholz.chandler.az.us> > Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:14:34 -0700 > > [...] but I don't doubt you can get yourself in another fix if you > keep on like THAT!
I don't mean to discourage you from hacking -- just the opposite! You might have found yourself at the bottom of a dark pit, but it was not all chaos. The continuations, their control points and dynamic states, look to be working correctly, though perhaps surprisingly. And an interrupt reset the console-thread. A surprise pitfall or two is more than half the fun, ya? The patch boarding up this pit is a kludge that enforces the expectation that block-on-io-descriptor is not unwound except by the thread holding the io registration. There might be situations where such intimate cooperation among threads is intended, where I have frustrated the intuitions of a different user, so I went no further than block-on-io-descriptor. Caveat within-continuation emptor. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
