Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:55:51 -0700 From: Matt Birkholz <m...@birkholz.chandler.az.us>
> If so, let's please revert them after 9.2, not before, so that we can > build 9.2 from 9.1.1. The patches train a 9.1 host to compile 9.2, but the resulting 9.2ish system doesn't need them. They can be removed before 9.2ish compiles the release thus removing all remnants of (ucode-type sequence-2) and the training required to grok the new (ucode-type sequence). What's the harm in keeping the patches in? I would like to observe a policy that release X must be able to build release X+1. If for some reason we badly want to do something that breaks release X's ability to build the current development version, we can always just first make release X+1 and then break it. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
