FWIW, the the build I'm using works fine on 10.8. Hopefully we'll get that released soon.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Taylor R Campbell <campb...@mumble.net> wrote: > Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:03:15 -0400 > From: Rich Loveland <r...@rmloveland.com> > > Do you mean a Scheme stack trace? I'm not sure how to get one. No > error was signalled in the controlling terminal, nor did the debugger > pop up in the terminal or in Edwin -- just the error message in an > Edwin window. > > M-x set-variable RET debug-on-internal-error RET #t RET > > I did grab some dtruss output from running Edwin and doing `M-x shell' > again; this is the only error I found (longer version is attached): > > That's not the error in question -- look for fcntl(..., F_SETFL, ...), > or the numeric value from <sys/fcntl.h> instead of F_SETFL. It looks > like this is probably the failure: > > fcntl(0x5, 0x4, 0x6) = -1 Err#25 > > But I don't see the creation of file descriptor 5, unless the trace > got out of order. > > (We should stop using sigprocmask so much... The dstack abstraction > is handy, but it can be done more safely with less overhead, and > without so thoroughly cluttering system call traces.) > > _______________________________________________ > MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list > MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
