If you guys can settle on something I'll release it. So far I'm not seeing a clearly identified revision to cut from.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Taylor R Campbell <campb...@mumble.net>wrote: > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:27:18 -0700 > From: Matt Birkholz <p...@birchwood-abbey.net> > > +all-native: > + $(MAKE) compile-microcode > + @$(top_srcdir)/etc/cross-compile.sh "$(MIT_SCHEME_EXE)" > + $(MAKE) build-bands > > Ugh... Please don't make more broken make hacks like this. I spent a > lot of effort to sort out the dependencies so that we can do a proper > parallel build. Let's fix the real problem, not regress and make it > harder to find. > > The whole point of the new Makefile.tools is to enable cross-builds > like compile-svm.sh does *without* hand-crufted linearizations in > shell script of the dependencies. > > What is the substantive difference between what compile-svm.sh does > and what the parallelized Makefile.tools/Makefile build does? Is it > just about compile-by-procedures and the production of bci files? I > don't think setting COMPILER:COMPILE-BY-PROCEDURES is necessary for > cross-compiling -- IN-CROSS-COMPILER already does that. > > _______________________________________________ > MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list > MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
