Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:50:54 +0000
From: Taylor R Campbell <campb...@mumble.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:14:47 -0700
From: Friar Puck <p...@birchwood-abbey.net>
I considered that, but the abstraction seemed generally useful (and
widely neglected), Scheme mutexes are cheap to create, and more are
better, contention-wise. At this point, serial-populations are
implemented and tested.
Hmm? I don't understand. Why create two separate abstractions? Just
protect all protections by a mutex by default, inside the population
^^^^^^^^^^^
abstraction.
I meant: `Just protect all _populations_ by a mutex by default, inside
the population abstraction.'
_______________________________________________
MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list
MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
