> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:00:16 -0700 > From: Matt Birkholz <m...@birchwood-abbey.net> > > Do we need (performance-wise, on some platform we care about) the 11 > primitives in syntax.c? It's just that GCC 7 is sortof down on > syntax.c (because of -Wimplicit-fallthrough). And re-writing the 11 in > Scheme using generic string ops would help Edwin deal with ustring > buffers some day (or just slow things down today?). > > This is a subliminal suggestion to the net gods. I wasn't proposing to > do the work. :-}
I don't really care, but can't you just add /*FALLTHROUGH*/ annotations to appease GCC? _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
