Yang jelas .NET sama Borland yang baru efeknya sama... boros resource! !! Aku coba delphi 8 aja udah gregetan, mending pake delphi 7 aja dah. Pake .NET lumayan... lambat juga tapi gak separah delphi 8. Menurut pendapat yang laen yang udah pernah coba gimana?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mr. Cempe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ya aku maafkan.... > Diskusi di tutup ganti topik lain. > > Ayo ajarin Microsoft.NET nih, lagi pengen tau. > Microsoft keluar dengan .NET nya, Borland mau keluar dengan DiamondBack nya. > Kita tunggu sepak terjang Microsoft sama Borland. Untuk kita2 cuman user > mana yang enak di pakai ya tinggal pakai. > > [ Artikel Cikal Bakal .NET-nya Microsoft ] > > > Conspiracy ?! > Over the past few weeks I've been thinking "what is the truth behind the > fact that Borland waits for more that 2 years for a .NET compliant tool?" Is > it possible that there is an "unsaid" agreement between Borland and > Microsoft, that Borland will move aside while MS picks enough of the market > to be sure developers will not look back for a hopefully better RAD for > .NET? > I've been digging the Internet for some information to confirm my thoughts, > and here's the result of my work. Note: much of the content below was > rephrased from the articles listed in the boxes left of the text. > > Back to the future > Anders Hejlsberg, Delphi inventor 1995 > . Anders Hejlsberg a quick info > . Goodbye Anders Hejlsberg! We'll miss you... > . Anders Hejlsberg Receives Prestigious Excellence in Programming > Award > Do you know that the man behind Delphi is Anders Hejlsberg, one of the > original members of the Borland company. During his time with Borland he > extended its' Turbo Pascal compiler. Eventually he became the chief > architect for the team which produced the replacement for Turbo Pascal - > Delphi. As a chief architect at Borland, Hejlsberg secretly turned Turbo > Pascal into an object-oriented application development language, complete > with a truly visual environment and superb database-access features. Once > touted as the "VB killer," Delphi has remained a cornerstone product for > Borland. > In 1996 he left Borland and joined Microsoft where he was the man behind J++ > and the Windows Foundation Classes. More recently he has led the team which > has created the C# programming language, and he's been a key participant in > the development of the .NET Framework. > Borland vs. Microsoft, a lawsuit 1996/1997 > . Borland sues Microsoft over brain drain > . Borland and Microsoft Announce Settlement > . What do you want to own today? > When Turbo-Pascal and Delphi Developer Anders Hejlsberg and Chief developer > Paul Gross (internet specific products) left Borland to work for Microsoft, > luring them with a generous salary, stock options, and a large sign- on > bonus, Borland sued for unfair recruiting practices. Borland also claimed - > that Hejlsberg was working on "Delphi for Java." > In the suit Borland alleged that Microsoft had hired 34 Borland employees > over the past 30 months in order to steal Borland trade secrets. Borland > also claimed that Microsoft offered and delivered expensive lures to Borland > workers. In two cases, incentives topping $1 million were involved. > According to the suit: > . Among the defecting workers were Paul Gross, Borland's senior R&D VP, and > Anders Hejlsberg, a major player in the development of Borland's technology. > . Microsoft offered Paul Gross a $1 million signing bonus, stock options, > and title to real estate near Microsoft's headquarters. He left Borland for > Microsoft in September 1996. > . Microsoft offered Anders Hejlsberg a signing bonus of $1.5 million and > stock options. Microsoft doubled the bonus to $3 million after Borland made > a counter-offer. Hejlsberg left Borland in October 1996. > > Due to the circumstances, Borland reports quarterly losses for the 4th time > within the last 8 quarters (2 years) and announces they will reduce the > number of employees by 15%. Borland wants to leave the end user business and > enter the market for business solutions. > > After two years, Borland and Microsoft have settled their lawsuit. In a > joint statement, Borland and Microsoft said, "We believe this settlement is > in the best interest of both our companies. This settlement resolves any > legal questions surrounding the lawsuit and allows both companies to move > forward." With that short statement, both companies have agreed to make no > further comments on the settlement. Details of the settlement were > confidential. So this suit was eventually settled; by that time, however, > Microsoft had put Hejlsberg to work. > > Microsoft "buys" Borland, 1999 > . Microsoft Buys Into Inprise (Borland), Settles Disputes > . Borland and Microsoft Announce Settlement > . Microsoft: Resistance is futile > June 8, 1999. Microsoft has bought a $25 million stake in Inprise, formerly > Borland, and entered into a $100 million alliance with the former rival. > Companies announced a set of technology and licensing agreements that will > be the basis for a long-term alliance between the two companies. As part of > the Microsoft/Inprise partnership, Inprise has agreed to do the following: > . Support the Microsoft Windows 2000 operating system, including the COM+ > and the Windows Distributed interNet Applications (Windows DNA) > architecture; > . License the latest version of the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC), the > standard C++ class library for developing applications for Windows. MFC will > ship with Borland C++Builder; > . License the latest version of the Windows platform software development > kit (SDK) through the Microsoft Open Tools licensing programm. > And most importantly, the companies have also agreed to settle a number of > long-standing patent and technology licensing issues. > > In exchange for a desperately needed $125 million cash infusion, Borland > gave Microsoft the blueprints for much of its key technology, let Microsoft > off the hook by settling long-standing patent disputes, and agreed to tie > its own tools even more tightly to the Windows operating system. Inprise > agreed to provide full access to more than 100 of its technology patents, > including spreadsheet technologies and pending patent applications related > to newer products. This transaction signified final victory for Microsoft in > an epic battle to control the desktop database and development tool > businesses. > > The agreements surprised analysts and industry observers. "It doesn't seem > like Inprise needed Microsoft technology or that Microsoft needed Inprise", > "I think there's more going on under the covers than is obvious. That's a > lot of money to pay for something like that.", were some opinions > > Conspiracy ?! > Over the past few weeks I've been thinking "what is the truth behind the > fact that Borland waits for more that 2 years for a .NET compliant tool?" Is > it possible that there is an "unsaid" agreement between Borland and > Microsoft, that Borland will move aside while MS picks enough of the market > to be sure developers will not look back for a hopefully better RAD for > .NET? > > I've been digging the Internet for some information to confirm my thoughts, > and here's the result of my work. Note: much of the content below was > rephrased from the articles listed in the boxes left of the text. > > Back to the future > Anders Hejlsberg, Delphi inventor 1995 > . Anders Hejlsberg a quick info > . Goodbye Anders Hejlsberg! We'll miss you... > . Anders Hejlsberg Receives Prestigious Excellence in Programming > Award > Do you know that the man behind Delphi is Anders Hejlsberg, one of the > original members of the Borland company. During his time with Borland he > extended its' Turbo Pascal compiler. Eventually he became the chief > architect for the team which produced the replacement for Turbo Pascal - > Delphi. As a chief architect at Borland, Hejlsberg secretly turned Turbo > Pascal into an object-oriented application development language, complete > with a truly visual environment and superb database-access features. Once > touted as the "VB killer," Delphi has remained a cornerstone product for > Borland. > In 1996 he left Borland and joined Microsoft where he was the man behind J++ > and the Windows Foundation Classes. More recently he has led the team which > has created the C# programming language, and he's been a key participant in > the development of the .NET Framework. > > Borland vs. Microsoft, a lawsuit 1996/1997 > . Borland sues Microsoft over brain drain > . Borland and Microsoft Announce Settlement > . What do you want to own today? > When Turbo-Pascal and Delphi Developer Anders Hejlsberg and Chief developer > Paul Gross (internet specific products) left Borland to work for Microsoft, > luring them with a generous salary, stock options, and a large sign- on > bonus, Borland sued for unfair recruiting practices. Borland also claimed - > that Hejlsberg was working on "Delphi for Java." > In the suit Borland alleged that Microsoft had hired 34 Borland employees > over the past 30 months in order to steal Borland trade secrets. Borland > also claimed that Microsoft offered and delivered expensive lures to Borland > workers. In two cases, incentives topping $1 million were involved. > According to the suit: > . Among the defecting workers were Paul Gross, Borland's senior R&D VP, and > Anders Hejlsberg, a major player in the development of Borland's technology. > . Microsoft offered Paul Gross a $1 million signing bonus, stock options, > and title to real estate near Microsoft's headquarters. He left Borland for > Microsoft in September 1996. > . Microsoft offered Anders Hejlsberg a signing bonus of $1.5 million and > stock options. Microsoft doubled the bonus to $3 million after Borland made > a counter-offer. Hejlsberg left Borland in October 1996. > > Due to the circumstances, Borland reports quarterly losses for the 4th time > within the last 8 quarters (2 years) and announces they will reduce the > number of employees by 15%. Borland wants to leave the end user business and > enter the market for business solutions. > > After two years, Borland and Microsoft have settled their lawsuit. In a > joint statement, Borland and Microsoft said, "We believe this settlement is > in the best interest of both our companies. This settlement resolves any > legal questions surrounding the lawsuit and allows both companies to move > forward." With that short statement, both companies have agreed to make no > further comments on the settlement. Details of the settlement were > confidential. So this suit was eventually settled; by that time, however, > Microsoft had put Hejlsberg to work. > > Microsoft "buys" Borland, 1999 > . Microsoft Buys Into Inprise (Borland), Settles Disputes > . Borland and Microsoft Announce Settlement > . Microsoft: Resistance is futile > June 8, 1999. Microsoft has bought a $25 million stake in Inprise, formerly > Borland, and entered into a $100 million alliance with the former rival. > Companies announced a set of technology and licensing agreements that will > be the basis for a long-term alliance between the two companies. As part of > the Microsoft/Inprise partnership, Inprise has agreed to do the following: > . Support the Microsoft Windows 2000 operating system, including the COM+ > and the Windows Distributed interNet Applications (Windows DNA) > architecture; > . License the latest version of the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC), the > standard C++ class library for developing applications for Windows. MFC will > ship with Borland C++Builder; > . License the latest version of the Windows platform software development > kit (SDK) through the Microsoft Open Tools licensing programm. > And most importantly, the companies have also agreed to settle a number of > long-standing patent and technology licensing issues. > > In exchange for a desperately needed $125 million cash infusion, Borland > gave Microsoft the blueprints for much of its key technology, let Microsoft > off the hook by settling long-standing patent disputes, and agreed to tie > its own tools even more tightly to the Windows operating system. Inprise > agreed to provide full access to more than 100 of its technology patents, > including spreadsheet technologies and pending patent applications related > to newer products. This transaction signified final victory for Microsoft in > an epic battle to control the desktop database and development tool > businesses. > > The agreements surprised analysts and industry observers. "It doesn't seem > like Inprise needed Microsoft technology or that Microsoft needed Inprise", > "I think there's more going on under the covers than is obvious. That's a > lot of money to pay for something like that.", were some opinions > > *** Uang mengalahkan segala-galanya...hehehehe > > Untuk lebih lengkapnya baca sendiri disini : > http://delphi.about.com/library/weekly/aa112902b.htm > > > > Mr. cMp > [BlajaranProgramGakOnokSingNyantolBlass] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/x3XolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ================> HAPUS IKLAN DIATAS DAN FOOTER INI JIKA ME-REPLY <================ Posting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive : http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ www.mitek.unibraw.ac.id || www.himamitek.cjb.net ************************************************************************************ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mitek/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
