Hi Sascha, Thank you for looking into it
What I liked from TubeTK was just that you have USE_SYSTEM_CTK, USE_SYSTEM_ITK and USE_SYSTEM_VTK readily available in the CMake GUI but maybe the current approach in mitk is better from the previous posts in the thread, if you want to use your own VTK, you should: - in the CMakeExternals directory - look for e.g: IF (NOT DEFINED ITK_DIR) - do something else ... but I still don´t know how to proceed :-( regards, sebastian On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Sascha Zelzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Looking at TubeTK's build system, I cannot see any substantial differences. > What is it you are missing in MITK's build system and handling of > dependencies? > > Thanks, > Sascha > > On 08/12/2011 11:52 AM, sebastian ordas wrote: >> >> Dear Sascha and Marco, >> >> Just FYI: have a look to the way TubeTK organizes the build of system >> VTK, ITK and CTK >> >> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/TubeTK/Development/Build >> >> maybe we can have something similar in MITK >> >> thank you! >> >> sebastian > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
