Hi, thanks for letting us know.
I agree that the serialization concept could need some love and refactoring though... Best, Sascha On 08/26/2014 04:56 PM, Rostislav Khlebnikov wrote: > Seems that as long as it is saved to the temporary directory, it works > as is :) Nevermind then. > > Rostislav. > > On 25/08/2014 21:15, Rostislav Khlebnikov wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> it seems to me that if a data object needs multiple files to be saved, >> it cannot be serialized now without many additional steps. Imagine an >> image that is saved in mhd format - which consists of two - an mhd file >> and a raw file. >> >> This is due to the fact that the Serialize() method is only allowed to >> return a single filename. So there are two options - manually creating >> an archive and returning it, or create support for multi-file >> serialization - which would just include replacing return value from >> std::string to std::vector<std::string> and some minor changes to the >> project saving procedure. >> >> Obviously just replacing the return value would likely induce some >> annoying compile-time errors for the external users of serailizers. So >> just introducing a new virtual method, named something like SerializeAll >> with the default implementation of "call Serialize(), make std::vector >> with one element, and return that vector" would be an easy and >> backward-compatible approach. >> >> What do you think about this? Should I quickly hack this and make yet >> another pull request? >> >> Cheers, >> Rostislav. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Slashdot TV. >> Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. >> http://tv.slashdot.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> mitk-users mailing list >> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > mitk-users mailing list > mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
