I see that it's calling `vtkSetMacro(EdgeVisibility, int);` , first question is 
resolved.

From: mikhail.pukhli...@outlook.com
To: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk; iweg...@gmx.de; 
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:18:38 +0400
Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model




Hello again,
>From what I see with diff this code just addds management for 
>"material.edgeColor" and "material.edgeVisibility" but for now I don't get how 
>they are handled. 
I've used to build MITK with those changes and they are added to polygonal 
model but nothing happens when I turn it on / off.
For ATT... files I'm getting error: `core.io.ioUtil ERROR: No reader available 
for 'F:\X\ATT00001'`But maybe it's because my MITK base is outdated?
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:35:59 +0100
> From: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk
> To: iweg...@gmx.de; mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model
> 
> Hi Ingmar,
> 
> well, basically it's a built-in functionality in VTK, so it's really 
> easy to implement. Actually all the necessary code is in the file I sent 
> previously :)
> 
> Overall, I'm just waiting for the official announcement of 2015.05 to 
> finalize integration and start talking about stuff I could contribute.
> 
> Cheers,
>    Rostislav.
> 
> On 08/06/2015 20:25, Wegner wrote:
> > Hi Rostislav,
> > is "edgeVisibility" your property to show mesh edges of a surace as well?
> > I was thinking about adding a render mode that combines surface 
> > representation with wireframe representation. Do you already have that 
> > feature added to your fork?
> > If so would you share the rest of the implementation? I could also 
> > isolate it and create a pull request in your name in my fork.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ingmar ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 08.06.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Rostislav Khlebnikov:
> >> There you go. My version also has a property to show edges on the
> >> surface, but it doesn't come into play unless you set the property
> >> "material.edgeVisibility" to true, so don't worry about this.
> >>
> >> Rostislav.
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2015 11:00, Pukhlikov Mikhail wrote:
> >>> Thank you, may you show the specific code for "mitkSurfaceVtkMapper3D
> >>> to apply a yellow color if the "selected" flag was set for the
> >>> surface" implementation
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> >>>
> >>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:09:28 +0100
> >>> From: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk
> >>> To: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mikhail,
> >>>
> >>> I think that displaying a selected data object is the data object's
> >>> mapper job. For surfaces, I modified the mitkSurfaceVtkMapper3D to
> >>> apply a yellow color if the "selected" flag was set for the surface.
> >>> Alternatively, you can just manually set the color once a node is
> >>> selected - but the mapper way is more robust.
> >>>
> >>> Regarding the dependencies - it's pretty easy to pull dependencies to
> >>> your plugin - just add "PACKAGE_DEPENDS VTK" to the
> >>> MACRO_CREATE_MITK_CTK_PLUGIN in the CMakeLists.txt of your plugin and
> >>> the dependency will be there - i.e. all headers will be available and
> >>> libraries will be linked with your plugin. Also, what you're trying to
> >>> do looks more like VTK's job rather than ITK's.
> >>>
> >>> Rostislav.
> >>>
> >>> On 08/06/2015 07:11, Pukhlikov Mikhail wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Hello,
> >>>
> >>>     Is there fast way to draw a contour around the model. I'm trying
> >>>     to implement locally selection mechanism and I think about fast
> >>>     way to display selection on 3D multiwidgety view. I was thinking
> >>>     about applieng some ITK filters maybe but it's way to slow and
> >>>     complicated since I need to get ITK deps into display interactor
> >>>     for doing it and it will work slow. May you suggest fast way how
> >>>     can I show selection of specific data node (model) in 3D view of
> >>>     multiwidget?
> >>>
> >>>     Thank you
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>     mitk-users mailing list
> >>>     mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> >>> <mailto:mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing
> >>> list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>  
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mitk-users mailing list
> >> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mitk-users mailing list
> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
                                          

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users                         
                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to