Hi, yes, I compared different releases on the same computer. The same dataset is loaded on MITK 2014.10 in 40 second, whereas MITK 2015.05 loaded only 13% in 3 minutes (then I terminated loading).
I have installed both releases on my computer, but DICOM loading on MITK 2015.05 was slow even before I reinstalled previous release (that was the reason why I reinstalled release 2014.10). Best, Urban On 4.8.2015 9:42, Goch, Caspar Jonas wrote: > Hi Urban, > > so far I have not heard other people complain about it. Did you by chance > compare loading the same data set on the same computer using the different > releases? How much longer does it take one versus the other? > > Best, > Caspar > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Urban Simoncic [mailto:urban.simon...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Juli 2015 00:46 > An: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [mitk-users] DICOM support in MITK 2015.05 > > Dear all, > > I realized that loading DICOM images in MITK 2015.05 is extremely slow on my > computer (Win 7 64bit) - much slower than in the previous release of MITK. Is > that because the MITK 2015.05 uses CTK for DICOM support? > BTW, loading DICOMs in 3D Slicer (which probably also uses CTK) is also very > slow in comparison to older releases of MITK. > > Has anybody else noticed this problem? > > Best, > Urban > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > mitk-users mailing list > mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
