Hi Laura,

the volume calculation of MITK already takes into account the thickness of the 
slices. You should be good there.

If you want to check for yourself, you can verify using the "Statistics"-view. 
By opening it and selecting the image & segmentation in the Data Manager, you 
will see some statistics about the masked region. This includes the volume and 
the number of voxels (N). By dividing these two (volume/N), you can verify how 
much volume each voxel has. For example with a spacing of 2mm, one would expect 
each voxel to have a volume of 2mm x 2mm x 2mm = 8mm³ , so the volume should be 
8 times the number of voxels. You can compare this with the volume you get from 
the Clipping Plane view and make sure they match up.

I hope this helps!

Best regards,
Stephen


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Laura D'Ambrosio <l.m.dambro...@web.de> 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2023 13:07
An: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [Extern] - [mitk-users] different volume depending on CT slice 
thickness?

Hi :)

I’m using the MITK program for my thesis as medical student. I’m not a pro in 
programming oder IT-stuff.
I manually segmented bone defects/non-unions and got the volume of these 
calculated with the tool of the clipping planes. I used series of computed 
tomography and put them in a DICOM file. Then I imported them to MITK.

Now I was wondering if the program also calculates the volume correctly when 
the slice thickness changes from the CT series? I noticed that some of the 
patients had a CT with a slice thickness of 1mm and some others with 2mm. Do I 
have to calculate something different then or does the MITK program adapt 
automatically.

I’m happy for any help!

Greetings,
Laura




_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to