On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Albert Santoni wrote:
> I think we can make it _much_ easier to do in Mixxx (we can take
> advantage of our BPM detection). 

Something along the lines of the CDJ400/800's Auto Beat Loop, which
creates a loop for 1,2,4 or 8 beats that you can then subdivide by
1/2, 1/4 or 1/8.

The difference is, however, that our BPM detection still sucks compares
to Pioneer's, so I think a prerequisite of a useable autolooper is a 
better Tap function which intelligently adjusts the beat marks and
informs the beat marking engine how to do its job better for this track
(in a way it'll remember next time!) rather than just updating the BPM. 

Ben


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel

Reply via email to