Albert Santoni wrote: > I don't think it would improve responsiveness to sync more often. (I may > be wrong here, so anyone should feel free to point out any flaws in my > logic.) If, for example, we were to sync the ControlObjects twice per > buffer, the second update of the position/pitch wouldn't do anything > because the audio callback would likely be past the time/pitch ... > Again, a practical way to do sub-latency pitch/position changes isn't > immediately obvious to me. That being said, I'm open to suggestions > here, although I think we're going to be limited by the latency no > matter what. (This is why you need a good soundcard/fast CPU for vinyl > control.) I'm also open to suggestions on all of the vinyl control code. > It's an area of Mixxx that hasn't seen much peer-review, and I think > there's lots of room for improvement there. > > Thanks, > Albert >
I see your point. Once VinylControlMsPinky is done, I will try to take a closer look at the overall sound engine. Thanks for the clarification. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
