Hi there. It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a better fit for his preferences. (I tried to post a comment to this effect in a response to his blog but it didn't show up.)
Basically, if you just want the computer to play the music and you'll do all mixing and effects externally (hardware-centered approach,) Xwax is what you want. If you want to be able to do everything (mixing, effects, etc.) in the computer for maximum flexibility and lowest cost using (relatively) dumb hardware simply for (tactile) control, Mixxx is your answer. Sean "D.J. Pegasus" <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses and cleared by >>SmartMail<< from Smarter Technology, Inc. <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
