> P.S. How do we stop regressions like this? Is it up to Mixxx to test > upstream Ubuntu beta versions each release?
I think stable versions should be tested with the releases which are supposed to support a said release, but supporting beta releases should be optional. I use jaunty, and have for months now. I know someone else does too. But we may not always have people using beta releases of ubuntu, and we'll never have someone for all beta releases of all distributions. Besides, the actual distro itself could have a nasty regression which affects mixxx. Jaunty has had more than a few hiccups (ATI Drivers, weird portaudio bugs... etc...) all of which affect mixxx in one way or another. Just to be sane, beta releases *MIGHT* (and usually will) work, but let's not get arsed about it if they don't. As they say, *BUYER BEWARE*. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s+:- a-- C+++(++++)$ UL+++$ P+ L+++>++++ E W++ N o? K- w++(---) O? M-- V PS+++ PE-(--) Y+(++) PGP t(+) 5(+) X++ R b+>++ DI+ D+ G e h-(--) r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
