Re-sending, attachment was too big for the list. http://senduit.com/eeb873 (300 KB .7z)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Albert Santoni <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM Subject: Fwd: gprof outputs To: Too Many DJs <[email protected]> Hi guys, Sean did some profiling to see if we could tell why there's an alleged performance difference between the PortMIDI branch and trunk, and the processed log files are attached. Nothing major jumped out at me when I looked at them, but another set of eyes on them wouldn't hurt. Thanks, Albert ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sean M. Pappalardo - D.J. Pegasus <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:49 AM Subject: gprof outputs To: Albert Santoni <[email protected]> Hello. Attached are the outputs from gprof on my Athlon XP-M laptop. I did trunk, the PortMIDI branch, and the 1.7 branch, all compiled with optimize=0, tuned=0 and asmlib=0. All were run with just one SCS.3d attached. I used vinyl3 mode to select & load an MP3 file that hadn't been analyzed, then played it and scratched it for a minute or so, then closed Mixxx. I also noticed that the playposition-based scratching (vinyl2 mode (purple)) no longer works in trunk/portMidi. I suppose that isn't too surprising since it's a big hack anyway. :) Let me know what you find out. Nothing is obvious to me, looking at these quickly. Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
