I can't find the source for "Digital DJ Pro", can anyone else? If not,
that's a violation of GPLv2, no?

-Scott

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 22:20 -0500, Garth Dahlstrom wrote:
> Hi Jus,
> 
> 
> Our relationship with "Music Oasis/Freeze.com" is not a friendly one,
> we have threatened them in the past for trademark violation.
> 
> 
> The levers of control Mixxx has over it's IP are:
>    * Trademark - the "Mixxx" brand and representations
> 
> 
>    * Copyright - published works: code, artwork, documentation,
> website, etc
> 
> 
> For trademark, its pretty simple, they can't use our name "Mixxx" or
> represent themselves as us in a manner that creates confusion in the
> marketplace.   We have taken steps to defend our trademark by
> threatening Music Oasis & co when they used our name and also claimed
> they had trademark over it on their site in the past (they put "Mixxx
> Digital DJ Pro" is TM of Music Oasis on the bottom of their webpage).
> They have since removed all references to "Mixxx".
> 
> 
> With respect to copyright the situation is a bit more complicated:
>    * Code: this is covered by the GPLv2, which means anyone can create
> and distribute binaries provided the source code and derived source
> code (for changes made) are available to the public to rebuild and
> pass along under the terms of the GPLv2.   (Provided they do not
> violate our other copyrighted materials or our trademark they are
> allowed to do this.)
> 
> 
>    * Artwork and other copyrighted works:   These are not licensed
> explicitly under the GPL, and so we can enforce copyright violations
> on these as we have made no grant of redistribution rights to
> anyone...   (This is why they have re-skinned / rebranded their copy) 
> 
> 
> The situation with Art is one of the primary motivations of why we'd
> want new skins to adopt a CC license (to prevent ripping off Mixxx)
> with an assignment of copyright to Mixxx so Mixxx can take action to
> stop groups like Music Oasis from ripping off the skins.
> 
> 
> I personally have no problem with people forking GPL code for profit,
> but I think there is a certain etiquette to doing it on good terms.
> I'm not saying one need ask for permission, but it's not nice to
> pollute the original groups trademark/market and try to pass of the
> work as entirely your own when all you did was change some artwork.
> Given that they have made pretty much no attempt to be on good terms
> with us or make even a token contribution back to the Mixxx community
> from which they profit, I would be happy to see Mixxx initiate full
> fledge litigation against them if they were found to be in violation
> of the GPL (though I can't speak on behalf of Mixxx as a whole in this
> respect).
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -G
> 
> 
> P.S. typed this in a bit of a hurry, so @mixxx.org folks feel free to
> add/correct if I missed on anything...  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2010-03-03, at 7:59 AM, jus wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > i was curious why there are more&more new users looking for help in
> > the forum referring to Mixxx as "Digital DJ pro" or "DJ Pro".
> > 
> > 
> > A quick search brings
> > up http://www.freeze.com/download/Audio/Digital-DJ-Pro and
> > http://www.music-oasis.com/download/Audio/Digital-DJ-Pro .
> > 
> > 
> > They only changed the "About" splashscreen & the default skin to an
> > own crappy one.
> > 
> > 
> > Windows users are tricked into downloading a "download manager"
> > which pulls the rebranded Mixxx 1.7.0 to the users computer.
> > The downloader drops additional payloads such as browser toolbars,
> > changes that browser startpage and set cookies that look like
> > measurement for a kind of revenue sharing program.
> > 
> > 
> > EXAMPLE:
> > ProductSessionId=ab106995-89bf-4c79-a0a9-d16f367893413077&VersionId=-1&Tracking=0&SessionTime=1/3/2010
> >  5:22:38 
> > AM&CampaignID=127849&ShortName=digitaldj&LeadmanSessionId=14c97e18-8069-41e5-9921-106995&PingRestrictionsRecorded=1&Membership=0.
> > 
> > 
> > If the download stats on freeze.com are correct over 400000 ppl
> > downloaded already...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Is it legal under the GPL to reuse Mixxx in that manner?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > jus
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev_______________________________________________
> > Mixxx-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel

Reply via email to