On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Owen Williams wrote: > I've noticed that at extremely slow speeds and during scratching, mixxx > sounds pretty terrible. There are lots of clicks and pops and high > pitched static. At first I thought this was because I was scratching > mp3s, but I took xwax 0.8 for a spin and it sounds much, much better. I > spent a day hacking on the linear sound scaler without much to show for > it. From looking at xwax, it looks like it uses a cubic interpolator > instead of linear. I tried implementing that logic into mixxx, with > disastrous results.
Don't expect the cubic interpolation to make much difference at all; it's just the icing on the cake over a linear interpolation. Try comparing to an older version of xwax which uses a linear interpolation. I understand Mixxx doesn't use sub-sample positionioning within the track. That's more likely to impact sound quality. -- Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
