Hey Ferran, We release the Mixxx binary under GPLv2 -- the GPL may be used for other works but it is primarily oriented towards code and I think the legalese around it makes it unclear what obligations there are to uphold as an artist. I think CC-BY-SA makes it much more clear and is better known among artists.
Cheers, RJ On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Ferran Pujol Camins < ferranpujolcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, I've read a bit about the GPL and CC licenses. > > Our three official skins (Deere, LateNight and Shade) currently are under > a CC-BY-SA <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> license, but > we release them with Mixxx under a GPLv2 license. This is incompatible > because we are releasing the skins as a whole product with a different > license. Shouldn't we just remove the CC license for the skins and release > all under the GPLv2? This is what's recommended here: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html#data > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today > http://mixxx.org > > > Mixxx-devel mailing list > Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today http://mixxx.org Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
