Hallo

>         Question is, has anyone tried to "rsh" some jobs out to other
>          computers (e.g.  on a 100Mb ethernet) to try to shorten the time,
>          or would that just mean the network becomes the bottleneck?
> 
> I use netpipes instead of rsh, but either way the network shouldn't be
> much of a bottleneck given that you're still only talking 4-6 fps at
> best.  I run smil2yuv, yuvcorrect, and yuvdenoise on one machine (the
> faster one), mpeg2enc on another, with y4mscaler in there somewhere.
> The trick is to balance the load, or else one of the CPUs gets wasted.
> I don't think a 3rd computer would help much, unless you use both
> yuvmedianfilter and yuvdenoise, since after the filtering and encoding
> the cpu requirements drop off considerably.  And obviously you can't
> send data too many times across the same network to multiple machines
> at once, or it will become the bottleneck eventually.

I can keep the first Machine (Athlon 1.4GHz) and the 2nd (Laptop PIV
1.9GHz) with that command really bussy:
> time lav2yuv p1.eli | yuvcorrect -T BOTT_FORWARD -v 0| yuvdenoise -F -f |  yuvscaler 
> -I ACTIVE_700x440+10+64 | rsh cyberdeck "buffer -m 10m | mpeg2enc -f 8 -4 1 -2 1 -q 
> 5 -P -I 0 -N 1.5 -o /mnt/enterprise/video_q5.p1.eli.m2v"

But both computers produce a traffic about 5MB/sec constant. On one
computer in and on the outher out. On a switch it is still no problem. 

auf hoffentlich bald,

Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/bernhard


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to