Hey Lee, On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:01, C.Lee Taylor wrote: > A qucik question reguarding the following statement ... > > >And yes, the 2.4 driver is "abandoned" until the ZORAN_VIDEODEV_2 (0.9.4 > >& co) have been integrated in 2.5.x, then I'll think about backporting > >it to 2.4.x. > > Is the 2.4 driver really abandoned? Should I not try an install the > 0.9.4 ( compile ) the drive in my kernel?
"Abandoned" is a big word... I mean, it's still in there, and the code doesn't differ significantly from what's currently in HEAD CVS (and will soon be moved over to a different branch, so ZORAN_VIDEODEV_2 can be moved over to HEAD), and I'm still trying to keep that one compiling under 2.4.x. However, if you want anything more than compiling help, I'd appreciate if people used 0.9.4 or ZORAN_VIDEODEV_2/CVS, that makes my life a lot easier, and it's being tested a lot more than the old driver these days. ;). Ronald -- Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
