On 26 Nov 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Is there any conflict if i use -H and -E simultaneously?
No conflict at all. -E processing is done after the quantization
tables have been used.
> If not, does it make sense from a logical p.o.v. to use them both?
Makes a lot of sense. -E goes thru the output of the quantization
process to make it more efficient to encode.
> Does -H override -K, or the other way 'round?
Well, yes. "-K hi-res" is the same as "-H" though so I'm not sure
why you'd want to use both :)
You can, if you wish, create your own custom matrices and use them
with "-K file=path_to_your_file". Thus you can take the intra (I
frame) table from the hi-resolution side and combine that with
the non-Intra (B/P frame) table of TMPGEnc.
I've attached the custom file where I did just that. The I frames
end up being bigger (but there are only on average 2 of those per
second) but the P/B frames become smaller. Overall the image looked
very good (but not having done double blind testing against a default
encoding that's not saying a lot ;)).
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
# High resolution INTRA table
8,16,18,20,24,25,26,30
16,16,20,23,25,26,30,30
18,20,22,24,26,28,29,31
20,21,23,24,26,28,31,31
21,23,24,25,28,30,30,33
23,24,25,28,30,30,33,36
24,25,26,29,29,31,34,38
25,26,28,29,31,34,38,42
# TMPEGEnc NON-INTRA table
16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23
17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24
18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25
19,20,21,22,23,24,26,27
20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28
21,22,23,24,26,27,28,30
22,23,24,26,27,28,30,31
23,24,25,27,28,30,31,33
