Hi, "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The usual advice at this point is to "try the latest version" ;) > > 1.6.2 was release a couple months ago. Not saying it'll fix the > problem but it might. Just did that but it wasn't the problem. Happy to have the latest version, though... > What size are the images? 640x480, 352x480, ??? Hmmm... 360x240... > The only thing that comes to mind is that the dimensions of the > frame are not both a multiple of 16. 320x240 is a good size, but > 328x240 is not - I'm wondering if something (WMP or Xine) is > implicitly assuming 16 pixel alignment somewhere and padding with 0. Bingo! 352x240 fixed the problem. Thanks very much for your help! Cheers, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gunnm: Broken Angel http://amv.reimeika.ca http://reimeika.ca/ http://photo.reimeika.ca ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
