Ray Cole schrieb: > Works :-) > > Not sure if you wanted feedback on results or not, but if so things > look pretty good to me.
That's fine... > I've been in the habit of having all the filters off except for the > temporal filter with yuvdenoise because adding the other filters > generally caused my bitrate to go up rather than down and it would > 'dull' the image a bit this was true for rather noisefree images. It shouldn't be true anymore... > yuvdenoise has been my favorite filter for some time - I really like > its results. 8-) > Anyway with the latest in the repository I ran it on some material > and I didn't notice it blurring the image. I did, however, notice a > little bit of 'blockiness' in a scene that was mostly blue sky > [...]There were clearly little squares blurred in the middle breaking > up at the edges [...] hmm, strange... as the new 3D filter (which is a 2D filter since last commit -- I should change the usage()...) is not block-based, this puzzels me a little bit. But as I encountered something simmilar (but in my case the blocks beeing green :) ), I would like you to: a) verify that these blocks are not introduced by mpeg2enc (which was it in my case) and b) if they are really introduced by the denoiser send me a ca. 50 frames y4mstream (please use bzip2...), as well as the used thresholds, so I can investigate (and possibly remove) that behavior of the denoiser, as it clearly should not add unwanted blocks... cu Stefan -- Gnomemeeting/Netmeeting: callto:ils.seconix.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 131490319 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
