On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Stan Gammons wrote:
> I encoded a DV capture today using the CVS version of mjpeg tools from
> last night. I noticed the length of the m2v file is MUCH smaller than
> one of a comparable run time (roughly 25 minutes) that I encoded a week
> or two ago. In the past the m2v files were roughly 1.3 Gigabytes. Now
> they are only 400 to 500 Megabytes. Has the command line switches
> changed? Here is the script I've been using.
Have you noticed the discussions on the mailing lists about a
nasty bug in mpeg2enc's rate control logic?
I think there have been several postings mentioning severe pixelization
and blockiness - a sign that the the encoder is over compressing
the data.
Steve Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
