What do you know, I have that issue.
Here are some quotes from the artilce:
"good low-end performance, and a whopping 22-hp gain at 6500 rpm where
the stock cams have started falling off."
Says thay idle smoothly also...
test vehicle was a daily driver with 130k miles on engine.
On a 2.0 Liter 16v engine, with a 1.8 head. TT sport cat, exhaust, and
fuel enrichment module
"Keeping in mind that day-to-day driving rarely touches a tach's red
zone, how do the Kent cams perform in the real world? Damn good, I think.
How's the idle? I really couldn't discern any difference-it's as smooth
as ever."
"Gaining horsepower at high rmp costs torque at the low end. Still,
notice (dyno chart in mag) the Kent 258's have way more torque than stock
from about 2500 rpm on up."
If you want to know anymore about the article, lemme know. Adios!
Markos
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 17:41:44 -0500 jimvish <[email protected]> writes:
>Doh! I don't have that one. Anyone out there with that issue?
>
>TIA
>Jim Weinheimer
>[email protected]
>85 GTI
>
>
>
>>There was a big article, with dyno, in ,I think, May 98 E.C.
>>
>>Fred
>
>
>>>Does anyone have or know where I can find dyno results of a 2.0L 16V
>with
>>>Kent 258 cams?
>
>_____________
>List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com
>To remove yourself from this list, send mail to
>[email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your
>message
>See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com
>Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
_____________
List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com
To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with
'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message
See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com
Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
