On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:33:01AM +0100, Mark Burton wrote: > > Further testing shows that you can get different output on subsequent > runs on the same input (ignoring the time stamps). > > So far, all of the differences appear to be caused by data being output > in a different order rather than the data itself being different. So, I > believe that the resulting maps are still good. You should understand > that the ordering of some of the map's data structures is not important > as long as all the cross-references match up.
Has anyone written a "lint" program for *.img files that would validate all the cross-references? Or a program to pretty-print the data structures in sorted format? The sorted pretty-print should be identical across runs. Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev